|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Dave Stark
4220
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 08:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:HAHA, It's The Wis!
Good to know he's still playing EVE.
I have nothing against The Wis, or his like, but CCP please nerf hisec so ISBOXERS can't affect the EVE economy like this.
i'll agree with you if you tell me how 96 accounts owned by 1 player is damaging the economy more than 96 individual players controlling all of those accounts. |
Dave Stark
4220
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 09:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:All mining should become a mini-game.
yes because making the lowest paid, tedious, and dull activity even more tedious and dull is a brilliant idea. |
Dave Stark
4220
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 09:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Diamond Zerg wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Diamond Zerg wrote:HAHA, It's The Wis!
Good to know he's still playing EVE.
I have nothing against The Wis, or his like, but CCP please nerf hisec so ISBOXERS can't affect the EVE economy like this. i'll agree with you if you tell me how 96 accounts owned by 1 player is damaging the economy more than 96 individual players controlling all of those accounts. Because if 96 players were playing, they'd all get a share of the profit. In this case, only one person gains an advantage (to the detriment of non multiboxing miners).
that's nice, but that's not damaging the economy. |
Dave Stark
4224
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 10:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Keno Skir wrote:I only see 50 of his fleet in that picture.. Where are the other 47?
Someone should just repeatedly wardec him so he constantly has to change corp on every one of his many alts..
npc corp, good luck with that. |
Dave Stark
4224
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 11:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Keno Skir wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Keno Skir wrote:I only see 50 of his fleet in that picture.. Where are the other 47?
Someone should just repeatedly wardec him so he constantly has to change corp on every one of his many alts.. npc corp, good luck with that. Ah pants i did wonder, didn't recognise the corp tag.. In that case.. I'll throw a couple disco boats at this if anyone else will?
even if he isn't in one now, one wardec and he will be. |
Dave Stark
4224
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 12:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:If you don't understand how producing 96n objects for the price of 1 "hurts" the economy,
when that happens, we'll let you know. as yet, it hasn't. |
Dave Stark
4228
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 15:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mr Blah Blahson wrote:Look at the price of White Glaze. You guys realize most of the hi-sec White Glaze is mined by massive multibox bot fleets, right?
Of course it hurts the economy. Look at ore prices over time. The supply is too massive, mainly due to stupid things like 95 person bot fleets.
white glaze. 283m/unit clear icicle. 213m/unit.
so i'm guessing clear icicle is mined by EVEN MORE MASSIVE MULTIBOX FLEETS right? |
Dave Stark
4233
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 17:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:This is the disservice the barge EHP buff has done to the EVE community. Notice how all of the mackinaws are alive and stealing all of that ice from the poor newbie ice miners. Think of the newbies, its time to revert the barge EHP buff. I agree.
mining barges needed more cpu/pg to fit a tank, not an ehp buff with the same restrictive cpu/pg that leaves slots empty due to a lack of cpu/pg.
that way, those interested and willing to protect their assets can, and those that don't want to are left to the sharks. |
Dave Stark
4235
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 18:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:La Nariz wrote:This is the disservice the barge EHP buff has done to the EVE community. Notice how all of the mackinaws are alive and stealing all of that ice from the poor newbie ice miners. Think of the newbies, its time to revert the barge EHP buff. I agree. mining barges needed more cpu/pg to fit a tank, not an ehp buff with the same restrictive cpu/pg that leaves slots empty due to a lack of cpu/pg. that way, those interested and willing to protect their assets can, and those that don't want to are left to the sharks. It's like you don't believe the procurer even exists.
it's like you've not actually read my posts.
once you've fit ice harvesting modules to a hulk, for example, you have less than 60 cpu remaining, and less than 12pg remaining. consider that a t2 invuln requires 44 cpu. even a meta invuln requires 34, which is over half of the available cpu. again; an arbitrary ehp increase is dumb when your ship will have empty slots due to it simply not having the pg/cpu to fit modules to it. |
Dave Stark
4238
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:once you've fit ice harvesting modules to a hulk, for example, you have less than 60 cpu remaining, and less than 12pg remaining. consider that a t2 invuln requires 44 cpu. even a meta invuln requires 34, which is over half of the available cpu. Then don't fit the ice harvester upgrades. You now have sufficient GP/CPU and two extra low slots to contribute to the tank.
so now i have empty low slots instead of empty mid slots. how does that resolve the issue that the ship simply doesn't have enough cpu/pg to fill the slots?
oh right, it doesn't. |
|
Dave Stark
4239
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:once you've fit ice harvesting modules to a hulk, for example, you have less than 60 cpu remaining, and less than 12pg remaining. consider that a t2 invuln requires 44 cpu. even a meta invuln requires 34, which is over half of the available cpu. Then don't fit the ice harvester upgrades. You now have sufficient GP/CPU and two extra low slots to contribute to the tank. so now i have empty low slots instead of empty mid slots. how does that resolve the issue that the ship simply doesn't have enough cpu/pg to fill the slots? oh right, it doesn't. Hulk fitDamage Control II Beta Reactor Control: Diagnostic System I Small Shield Extender II Small Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Modulated Strip Miner II,Veldspar Mining Crystal I Modulated Strip Miner II,Veldspar Mining Crystal I Modulated Strip Miner II,Veldspar Mining Crystal I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I You were saying? Don't scoff at the smalls, they add 3kEHP against hybrid.
like i said, it doesn't have the cpu/pg to fill the mid slots. as demonstrated by the fitting mod on your fit. and i will scoff at the smalls; it's a cruiser sized ship it should be using cruiser sized modules, that would mean mediums not smalls.
also, does that fit work with ice harvesters? more curiosity than anything since i've already proven my point, and you couldn't make it work either. |
Dave Stark
4239
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
one ship not sucking isn't justification for another ship to have a flaw. |
Dave Stark
4239
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
RAIN Arthie wrote:Dave Stark wrote:one ship not sucking isn't justification for another ship to have a flaw. Dave, you need to smile more.
are you on drugs? |
Dave Stark
4239
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:one ship not sucking isn't justification for another ship to have such glaring a flaw. OK. I'll complain about the Nereus's mining yield. After all, the hulk's strength in yield isn't justification for the Nereys's glaring flaw, right?
no because the nereus isn't a mining ship.
if you're resorting to nonsense because you haven't got a legitimate point, stop posting. it's less embarrassing for both of us. |
Dave Stark
4240
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:51:00 -
[15] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:no because the nereus isn't a mining ship. Just as the hulk isn't a tanking ship.
no ship is a tanking ship. |
Dave Stark
4241
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 19:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
Alaekessa wrote:Kate stark wrote:Louise Beethoven wrote:These no life losers ruin the game for everyone remind me again how this is any different to 97 players doing the exact same thing? oh wait, it isn't. 1 guy sitting in his skidmarked underwear in his mom's basement, using a third party program to log in his 97 accounts and then undock his 97 accounts to go drain an entire belt in record time is exceedingly different from 97 players doing the same thing. Allow me to count the ways.... 1) No herding cats. This alone could be argued to be more than enough difference. 2) When 97 guys all get together to drain belts in record time, they're going to each want to get some compensation. When 1 guy multiboxes 97 accounts, it is very likely that 96 of those accounts aren't getting a goddamn penny. Therefore, there is no distribution of wealth. 3) The "emergent gameplay" of awoxing? The risk of that occurring is significantly reduced, yet the payout is disproportionately high. What ever happened to "No Risk. No Isk"? 4) 97 guys will not all be cycling at the exact same time, there will be some variation to it. Someone might need to go AFK for what they assume will be 45 seconds which turns into 45 minutes, this impacts the yield of the fleet (albeit in a minor way, though potentially moreso depending on how attentive you can keep them all). 5) MMO means "Massively MULTIPLAYER Online" not "Massively MULTIACCOUNT Online". Where are the guys who used to rail against lone high-sec miners saying that they're "not playing the game as intended, it is a MMO, not an Online Singleplayer game and that is why it is ok for me to gank them, to force them to interact with other players in the MMO". Multiboxing totally turns that on its head. Why should I bother interacting with anyone else if I can muster my own 100 man fleet and go do whatever the hell I damn well please? It removes the social aspect of the game. Throw the adages "Friends are OP" and "Teamwork is OP" right out the ******* window and just accept that multiboxing is a whitewash facade for covering that Eve has become P2W.
yeah so as we'd already established there are no differences and it doesn't matter who is controlling the accounts. welcome to about 3 pages ago? |
Dave Stark
4243
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:no because the nereus isn't a mining ship. Just as the hulk isn't a tanking ship. no ship is a tanking ship. Aye. The hulk's weakness is it's weak tank. So I'm guessing you think that the hulk should lose a couple of mids in light of the fact it wouldn't be able to fit medium size shield mods without sacrificing some harvesters?
there's a difference between the hulk having a "weak tank" which it is obviously meant to have, and the simple fact that it doesn't have the cpu/pg to fit a tank once mining modules have been fitted.
no, losing the mids is the exact reverse of the original point. if anything it should lose base ehp in favour of fitting so people can either fit it with a level of tank to suit them, or not. as the case goes you either use ALL of the slots for tank or you simply can't fit a tank to it. |
Dave Stark
4244
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:losing the mids is the exact reverse of the original point. if anything it should lose base ehp in favour of fitting so people can either fit it with a level of tank to suit them, or not. as the case goes you either use ALL of the slots for tank or you simply can't fit a tank to it. Actually, a mid-slot removal may well be necessary. Combined with a PG increase of ~8-10, you could fit a med shield extender, along with the rest of the tank. Even without a 4th mid slot however, you could still fit 4kEHP more than now. The compensation would come from your suggested native tank nerf.
*shrug* i leave the balance and numbers up to CCP. however having a ship that simply can't fill all of it's slots is pretty dumb.
as i pointed out, once i've put mag stabs on my vindi, that can still fit a more than sufficient tank. There's no reason why a hulk shouldn't be able to do the same, even if i have to downgrade to meta modules. fitting implants etc are an acceptable price to pay to upgrade that to t2.
i don't expect to have max tank and yield, but on the other hand fitting for max yield shouldn't stop me filling my mid slots with useful modules. (again, even if they have to be meta 4 to fit.) |
Dave Stark
4244
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:That's why I'm questioning the presence of 4 mids. On a ship who's tank is meant to suck, why have them? Aside from tank (which, is very difficult to fit on a hulk), is there any point in having so many?
if they nerf the innate ehp, yes. if not, then no. |
Dave Stark
4244
|
Posted - 2014.01.18 20:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Ekkentros Mercari wrote:That's why I'm questioning the presence of 4 mids. On a ship who's tank is meant to suck, why have them? Aside from tank (which, is very difficult to fit on a hulk), is there any point in having so many? if they nerf the innate ehp, yes. if not, then no. What would you use the 4 mids for, if you have a better PG and/or CPU? tank? not quite sure tracking enhancers are all that useful on a hulk. |
|
Dave Stark
4264
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 08:19:00 -
[21] - Quote
trader joes Ichinumi wrote:I lost you when you started claiming that ice mining yield fun.
it all depends on what movie you've got playing on your 2nd monitor i guess. |
Dave Stark
4271
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 11:48:00 -
[22] - Quote
Yosef Brinalle wrote:It seems like a practicle way to make enough ISK to live off EVE RMTing.
by doing the lowest paid activity in eve? |
Dave stark
4271
|
Posted - 2014.01.19 12:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
we should ban anyone who has a fleet of more than like 5 players because it's "ruining it for people that do pay". |
|
|
|